HOWEDY lyingdogDUMMY aka tommy
soronson aka joey finnochiario (moderator
of HOWER HIV forum) aka jackass morison,
you anonymHOWES lying dog abusing punk
thug coward and mental case,
"Handsome Jack Morrison" wrote in
message
> On 22 Nov 2004 20:27:19 GMT, rherroniii.DeleteThis@aol.com (Rherroniii)
wrote:
>
> []
> >All that being said,
You want MOORE you freakin imbecile?
You're a latent homosexual homophobe.
You're OTHER alias is joey finnochiario,
MODERATOR of the HIV forums. Your
INTENT is to HURT and MURDER QUEERS
by CONvincing them that HIV is a SCAM
by the drug companies to RIP OFF UNCLE
SAM for RESEARCH FUNDS at their expense
and that HIV is NOT CONtagiHOWES and
UNPROTECTED SEX is SAFE.
<snip aggression>
> > Was this an attempt to protect me from
> > the strange man he did not know?
ALL AGGERSSION IS FEAR.
> Maybe.
Maybe NUTHIN. And that ain't ALL.
ALL aggression is CAUSED BY MISHANDLING.
> > Did the fact that it was dark outside have
> > something to do with it?
You gonna blame mishandling on the dark?
Perhaps you should ask scotty if he thinks
maybe the dog was SPOOKED by GHOSTS
like his dog was?
> Maybe.
Maybe NUTHIN.
Aggression can be EXXXTINGUISHED
NEARLY INSTANTLY by simply PRAISING
the dog when he's AFRAID.
LIKE THIS:
HOWEDY Brandy,
"Brandy Kurtz" wrote in message
> KraftyKurtzs.DeleteThis@wmconnect.com (Brandy Kurtz) wrote in message
...
>
> > Hello everyone! We have a 2 1/2 year old male
>
> Well I just printed out the Amazing Puppy Wizard info,
> so I haven't actually started to train yet.
>
> Today a salesman knocked on the door, and Pokey
> was going balisstic. I calmly go to the window to see
> who it is, and off-handly say Good Boy, It's a stranger,
> Good Boy. Pokey shut right up, gave me a quizical
> look, and came and sat beside my feet! OMG, I could
> not believe it!
>
> I was totally floored, as this has been his
> behavior since a pup. Just wanted to update,
> and Pokey and I are hitting the sack...;)
Well THAT IS encouraging, AIN'T IT.
> Brandy
And THIS:
"Estel J. Hines" wrote in message
>
> Until i read the Jerry method of Bark reductioon,
> it went something like this with our 11 month old
> puppy "Yoshi"
>
> Yoshi: Bark, bark,
>
> us: HUSH Youshi
>
> Yoshi Bark, bark......................
>
> us: Hush Youshi
>
> Yoshi BARK, BARK, BARK, .................................i
> it stopped when Yoshi got tired barking
>
> We decided to try the Jerry method
>
> :Yoshi: BARK, BARK
>
> US: GOOD Yoshi, Good Boy, who is it?
>
> Yoshi Bark, Bark
> US: It's ok, good boy Yoshi, We know them
>
> Yosh without fail, now stops after we say that
>
> I must say, it is so much more fun, when we
> can praise him, to deal with things like this
>
> Thanks Jerry
>
> ps: We are just starting to go thru the Jerry
> Papers, and learn how to live with our son
> "Yoshi", whom we love very much.
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Estel J. Hines
==============
> It may even have been the pizza box.
You don't think the dog EVER seen a pizza?
Maybe he was SCARED by THUNDER in the
distance?
You could CURE THAT EZ, JUST LIKE THIS:
Chris Williams writes:
"The FREE Wits' End Dog Training Method manual
I do find valuable. Much of it I recognize as what
I've always done without thinking of it as "training".
New stuff, I've used. His anchoring technique erased
the last of Mac's fireworks trauma,"
And THIS:
"Dan Moore"
wrote in message
...
>
> Tracy,
>
> What worked for me, in just one storm,
> was to praise the dog after each clap
> of thunder, telling him he's a Good Dog!
>
> This is an almost 13 year old Doberman, BTW.
>
> The next time it thundered, he did not even react at
> all--you could not tell it was the same dog as before.
>
> There was more thunder just the other day, and same
> thing, nada, nothing, zilch, no cowering, whimpering,
> trying to hide at all, it was that simple.
>
> I got this idea from Jerry Howe, who might seem
> to be a "wild and crazy" character, but his non-
> abusive way of handling dogs WORKS.
>
> Wonderfully.
>
> Praise.
>
> It's that simple.
>
> Juanita
=============
> He may even have preferred another kind of
> pizza, e.g., deep-dish Sicilian style. :)
Well then, grHOWELIN at the PIZZA DELIVERY
man would be CONtraWIZE, wouldn't it, tommy.
Dogs are SCAVENGERS, tommy. Dogs STEAL
scraps and RUN to HIDE to eat them with their
back to the wall in a heightened state of alert.
Dogs don't ORDER PIZZA, tommy. If someWON
is OFFERIN a FEARFUL dog FOOD it OFTEN
makes them POSSESSIVE AGGRESSIVE and
causes them to ATTACK the person offering the
BRIBE as some of your pals here have learned
the HARD way when their dogs tried to attack
their guests whom they've given TREATS to
BRIBE friendship and TRUST or like your pal
matty who got bit trying to bribe a toy HOWETA
a dog's MHOWETH and caused IT to swallow
the toy the bag of treats and matty's hand.
> >Any thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.
BWEEEEEEEEEAAHAHAHHAHAAAAA!!!
> It could also be a reflection of the dog's
> current/past insecurities.
That so, tommy? You think the dog should
lay on the C-HOWECH for a while an talk?
Perhaps he should consult Sonya Fitzpatrick
for the dog's emotional well bein, eh tommy?
You never did say what's it gonna be, white
or pearly, FLHOWERS or BHOWE ties...,
Churchill or Parker.
Did you get your fabric over to liea for the quilt?
> He's still settling in, right?
S-HOWENDS like he's SETTLED just fine, tommy.
The dog is PROTECTING his HOWES, just like
HOWE he's SUPPOSED TO.
Ain't he.
> So he's probably not sure yet how
> things are going to shake out for him.
You think he should attend CONSELLIN?
> He's been abandoned at least once already...
You think the dog thought the PIZZA MAN was
the DOG OFFICER comin to take IT back to the
P-HOWEND, tommy?
You're INSANE.
> If you think you're up to it (and your
> dog has been otherwise trustworthy),
You mean other than attackin ONLY pizza men, tommy?
> you might want to get some of your friends to act as
> foils, and have them (one at a time, over a week or so)
> try to replicate the pizza man's behavior,
They could dress up in that little pizza man
HOWEtfit with the tall funky hat an spinnin
the DHOWE in the air, eh tommy?
They could cook up some D'Giorno in the micro
wave and have the STOOGE carry it in for the dog.
What kind did you say you thought he likes, tommy?
> and see what happens.
He's gonna share his bunk with the pizza man
after abHOWET a week of STOOGES dressin
up like the pizza man and feedin him.
> Try to figure out if it's the pizza box, the dark,
> the cap he might have worn, the distance
> between you and the "pizza man," being
> startled, or something else altogether,
You mean instead of just EXXXTINGUISHING
or putting the behavior ON COMMAND, tommy?
What a OPPORTUNITY to turn POISON into
MEDECINE!
That's BRILLIANT TOMMY!
You're a GENIUS!
We'll TRY to figger HOWET what SCARES
the dog an we'll USE IT to TEACH him HOWE
to PROTECT the HOWES!
> that caused his reaction.
The dog was DOIN what dogs DO, tommy.
His "REACTION" was NORMAL, tommy.
The dog DIDN'T STOP REACTING on
accHOWENT of the other DUMMY didn't
PRAISE HIS DOG when IT WAS SCARED,
tommy.
THAT'S MISHANDLING.
> Many Labs can be "protective,"
You mean AFRAID and UNPREDICTABLE.
> but they normally stop at sounding the
> alarm, e.g., barking, maybe a little growl, etc.
Dogs do not PROTECT their HOWESES if
they've been ABUSED, tommy. They protect
themselves... THAT'S HOWE COME they
"normally stop S-HOWENDING the alarm"
when they know THEY ain't the TARGET.
> And some will even charge and bite,
And you MURDER THEM on accHOWENT
of you HURT and INTIMIDATE dogs to train
them.
> but, thankfully, those are still relative rarities.
Yeah. AbHOWET 5%. MINIMUM.
CONSISTENTLY.
From: Lindalee
To: Jerry Howe
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: dog aggression -
Today Seemed Like A Miracle -
WELCOME TO WITS' END DOG TRAINING!
Sunshine is still acting like a new dog!
Saw a dog today and "good boy-" worked
along with calling him-came the first time
every time. Not even a sound out of him.
Think it is hard for him but he never even
seemed to think about going off-reacting.
The word come has no affect on him just
the phrase- -Sunshine come goodboy.
Subject: Re: Lab/Rot 11 Months (TEMPER PROBLEMS)
Date: 2004-05-21 19:22:05 PST
> "Zack Pellers"
> wrote in message
> dlinge1.DeleteThis@towson.edu (Derek) wrote in
> 697700b8.0405202039.5c7374b9.DeleteThis@posting.google.com:
>
> Your dog needs to be retrained. Contact Mr. Jerry Howe.
>
> Http://www.DoggyDoRight.com
>
> You can start by downloading the free training
> manual available on the site above. I used it on
> my 4 year old Fila Brasileiro.
>
> When I first brought him home from rescue, he
> was similar to the way you decribed your dog.
> After using Mr. Howe's training method, the dog
> was cured within 72 hours.
>
> -Jack
"Leprechaun" wrote in message
> >Jerry believes he's a dog trainer.
>
> Fortunately, I happen to believe he is too.
> I took a rescued three year old beagle that
> had been kept outside all of its life that didn't
> even recognize or respond to its name to
> Jerry's home (That ugly cinder block shack???
> get real) and in just over one hour of working
> with the dog, he was coming on command
> (not a quickly as he does now, but still...) and
> walking with us on a loose lead.
>
> His "hot/cold" exercise and "come when called"
> command and pack exercise WORK!
>
> > and in all likelihood he's never even been near a dog.
>
> Well, he's been near mine, and done wonders for him.
>
> You don't have to like him. You don't have
> to agree with his methods, but as far as I
> am concerned, I've never seen any other
> training approach that was as fast and easy.
>
> <<<< Rest of original post deleted >>>>
>
> Ron Flanagan
> Orlando, Florida
-----------------------
> Maybe start with friends your dog already
> knows (and is friendly with), and then
> progress to complete strangers (to the dog),
> etc.
We just been through this, for five years, tommy.
It's OVER. You're full of crap.
> If your dog is trained to "sit" and "come" already,
He SEZ the dog's been DOIN that.
> this would be a good way to "proof" his training,
Very interesting, tommy. You're gonna make
the dog sit and then cause IT to BREAK the
"COMMAND" and then HURT the dog for
breaking the command.
THAT'S PROOFIN.
You can't PROOF a COMMAND with distractions
UNTIL you've TRAINED the dog WITH DISTRACTIONS.
Since the visitor IS the DISTRACTION that you're
TRAININ the dog to SIT THROUGH, you CANNOT
PROOF IT until the dog has LEARNED to sit through
a DISTRACTION.
SO, you've jumped the gun again, tommy.
> using your friends as DISTRACTIONS.
> E.g., as soon as the "pizza man" approaches,
> command your dog to "come," and then "sit."
> If he obeys, praise him and give him a treat.
You CANNOT reward a behavior the dog
AIN'T THINKIN of. By the time the dog SITS
he's NO LONGER THINKING of SITTIN, he
MAY BE THINKIN of ATTACKIN the visitor.
Offering FOOD to a FEARFUL DOG often
MAKES them FOOD AGGRESSIVE and
CAUSES them to ATTACK.
REMEMBER tommy? You've SEEN PLENTY
CASE HISTORIES of the same same behavior.
> If he doesn't, correct him immediately,
You mean HURT the dog, tommy.
> and start all over again,
No. We've been through all that, tommy.
You CANNOT HURT a DUMB ANIMAL
to TRAIN IT to BE FRIENDS.
> until he does obey.
You can't post here abHOWETS nodoGgamenedMOORE, tommy.
> The latter would also mean that he's not trained yet,
So HOWE do you CORRECT a dog PRYOR
to TRAININ IT, and RE TRAINING IT WITH
DISTRACTIONS PRYOR to "PROOFIN" with
"CORRECTIONS," tommy?
You can't have it BOTH ways noMOORE, tommy.
Not like HOWE you do with your SELECTIVELY
BRED dogs that NEED to be CHOKED and SHOCKED
to do the most natural thing in the Whole Wild World
for a RETRIEVER DOG to do... HUNT BIRDIES.
> and needs more work, using similar distractions.
Perhaps they should send HOWET for the Chinks?
You think Labradorable dogs LOVE Egg Foo Young
or do you think they prefer Some Young Guy like
your seven sissy sons, tommy?
> Just because your dog will "sit" for you in the house,
> with no one else around, doesn't mean that he's
> trained yet.
RIGHT. You gotta TRAIN him WITH distractions
in several different environments PRYOR to
PROOFIN, AIN'T THAT CORRECT, tommy.
BWEEEEEEAAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!
YOU STILL AIN'T GETTIN IT BOTH WAYS
UNLESS The Amazing Puppy Wizard is
GIVIN IT to you BOTH WAYS, tommy.
> Until he reliably "sits," "comes," etc., at all times,
> no matter the distraction, he's not really trained yet.
SO YOU CAN'T PROOF HIM TILL THEN.
AND YOU CAN'T BREAK THE AGGRESSION
TILL THEN OR YOU'D BE HURTING THE DOG
FOR SUMPTHIN HE AIN'T BEEN TAUGHT.
But that's JUST ACCORDIN to YOUR OWN WORDS.
BWEEEEEEEAAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!
YOU'RE A FRAUD A LIAR A DOG ABUSER
A COWARD and ACTIVE LONG TERM INCURABLE
MENTAL CASE.
> However, if you don't feel up to the above
You mean trainin the dog to sit through distracions?
Only takes a HOWER at most, tommy.
>(and can't really figure out the scenario
Yeah. You couln't find your arse with both
hands on accHOWENT of all the smoke.
> I tried to describe above),
What you DESCRIBED above is HOWE COME
kwbrown and laura arlov and tara o. aka tee and
Robert Crim MURDERED THEIR OWN DEAD
DOGS, thanks to your EXXXPERT advice, tommy.
REMEMBER NHOWE, tommy?
> you might just want to consult with a local
> trainer/behaviorist -- before this "problem"
> escalates.
BWEEEEEAAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!
You MIGHT just wanna have your "BEHAVIORIST"
post RIGHT HERE to The Amazing Puppy Wizard.
> Good luck,
Dog trainin AIN'T LUCK, lyingdogDUMMY. "LUCK
is for SUCKERS," The Puppy Wizard's DADDY.
> Trey, and thanks for rescuing Reagan!
We've MISSED you thankin folks for RESCUIN dogs,
tommy. You should try to post regularly when you ain't
HUNTIN for The Amazing Puppy Wizard in your sock drawer.
> Handsome Jack Morrison
> *gently remove the detonator to reply by e-mail
Oh hey? Lookey here. Here's lyingdogDUMMY aka
tommy soronson aka joey finnochiario aka jack
morrison beatin a dog to HOWEsbreak IT to save ITS life:
But FIRST, a little good KOEHLER trainin:
Koehler On Correcting The Housebreaking
Backslider.
"If the punishment is not severe enough, some of
these "backsliders" will think they're winning and
will continue to mess in the house.
An indelible impression can sometimes be
made by giving the dog a hard spanking of long
duration, then leaving him tied by the mess he's
made so you can come back at twenty minute
intervals and punish him again for the same
thing. (Dogs are REALLY stupid. J.H.)
In most cases, the dog that deliberately does this
disagreeable thing cannot be made reliable by the
light spanking that some owners seem to think is
adequate punishment. It will be better for your dog,
as well as the house, if you really pour it on him."
"Housebreaking Problems:
"The Koehler Method of Dog Training"
Howell Book House, 1996"
Occasionally, there is a pup who seems determined to
relieve himself inside the house, regardless of how
often he has the opportunity to go outside. This dog
may require punishment.
Make certain he is equipped with a collar
and piece of line so he can't avoid correction.
When you discover a mess, move in fast, take him to
the place of his error, and hold his head close enough
so that he associates his error with the punishment.
Punish him by spanking him with a light strap or
switch. Either one is better than a folded newspaper.
It is important to your future relationship that you
do not rush at him and start swinging before you get
hold of him.
When he's been spanked, take him outside.
Chances are, if you are careful in your feeding
and close observation, you will not have to do
much punishing.
Be consistent in your handling.
To have a pup almost house-broken and then force
him to commit an error by not providing an opportunity
to go outside is very unfair. Careful planning will
make your job easier.
The same general techniques of housebreaking
apply to grown dogs that are inexperienced in the
house.
For the grown dog who was reliable in the house
and then backslides, the method of correction
differs somewhat.
In this group of "backsliders" we have the
"revenge piddler." This dog protests being alone by
messing on the floor and often in the middle of a bed.
The first step of correction is to confine the dog
closely in a part of the house when you go away, so
that he is constantly reminded of his obligation.
The fact that he once was reliable in the house is
proof that the dog knows right from wrong, and it
leaves you no other course than to punish him
sufficiently to convince him that the satisfaction of
his wrongdoing is not worth the consequences.
If the punishment is not severe enough, some of
these "backsliders" will think they're winning and
will continue to mess in the house.
An indelible impression can sometimes be made
by giving the dog a hard spanking of long duration,
then leaving him tied by the mess he's made so you
can come back at twenty minute intervals and
punish him again for the same thing.
In most cases, the dog that deliberately does this
disagreeable thing cannot be made reliable by the
light spanking that some owners seem to think is
adequate punishment.
It will be better for your dog, as well as the house,
if you really pour it on him.
"Handsome Jack Morrison"
wrote in
<message
> On 26 Jul 2003 22:14:29 GMT, dogstar716.DeleteThis@aol.com
> (DogStar716)
wrote:
>
> >>>Never mind dogman :)
> >>
> >>You too? Some folks just never learn.
> >
> >Uh huh :)
>
> One of the signs of mental illness is to say "Uh
> huh" a lot.
>
> >>PS: If the "trainer" you were talking about isn't
> >>on this list, he (or she) is NOT an approved
> >>Koehler trainer, no matter how loud you scream
> >>otherwise.
> >
> >May I laugh again? LOL! One doesn't need to be on
> >a list to use Koehlers methods or teach his
> >methods.
>
> Let me be among the first (apparently) to tell you
> that not every trainer who uses a leash is a
> *Koehler* trainer.
>
> Sheesh.
>
> This person may call herself a Koehler trainer, but
> if she's hanging 12 week old puppies, she's about as
> far from a Koehler trainer as a dog trainer can
> possibly be.
>
> Again, this is just your IGNORANCE showing.
>
> I can call myself a devout Christian, but if I'm not
> adhering to the doctrine, I'm something else.
>
> >>http://www.koehlerdogtraining.com/patoflearn.html
> >Sorry, the very first sentences make me aware that
> >whoever wrote it knows nothing about PR based
> >training:
> >
> >"Amidst the current (and politically correct) trend
> >in Positive Reinforcement Only training systems"
> >
> >You cannot use PR only.
>
> Au contraire. Many, many posters to r.p.d.b. (and
> many other places as well) *claim* that they use
> nothing but R. You know, the PPers.
>
> And they do it quite loudly, too.
>
> Surely you aren't blind (and deaf), as well as
> ignorant?
>
> Those are hard handicaps to overcome, Dogstar.
>
> >And if you knew anything about PR BASED training,
> >you would realize that. It's not all cookies and
> >babytalk.
>
> There is no stronger supporter of R than Handsome
> Jack Morrison, but I also use every behavioral tool
> in my bag, including R-, P, and P-, because I know
> that even R has its limits.
>
> You'd know that too, if you didn't have your head in
> the sand.
>
> > But that seems to be the battle cry of the
> > Koehler-ites.
>
> The Koehlerites have no battle cry.
>
> They have behaviorism on their side, and that's more
> than enough.
>
> >I don't need instruction on how to give my dogs a
> >proper leash correction as I do not rely on a leash
> >to control or teach my dog.
>
> That may or may not be suitable for your needs, but
> it's not suitable for the majority of dog owners,
> especially since the advent of leash laws.
>
> Besides, after just a few weeks of proper Koehler
> training, Koehler dogs likewise are no longer in
> need of a leash.
>
> That you apparently don't know that, once again
> shows me just how ignorant of anything to do with
> Koehler you are.
>
> >My last two dogs have been trained offleash right
> >from the start, using rewards for what I like, and
> >nothing for what I don't like.
>
> Good for you, and if that level of training is good
> enough for you, fine. But it's not good enough for
> many of the rest of us.
>
> >Again, I'm not saying Koehler doesn't work.
>
> I really have no idea what you're saying anymore,
> because you apparently know so damn little about
> Koehler and behavioral principles in general that
> it's hard to have an informed discussion with you.
>
> PS: It boggles my mind at how stupid you must be to
> keep denying that those certain harsh methods are
> only for LAST RESORT situations, intended only to
> SAVE A DOG'S LIFE, even after I've repeatedly given
> you direct *quotes* from Koehler's book saying just
> that. It's like you don't even care how stupid
> people think you are, or how devious you are, etc.
> That can't help your cause any. You'd think that
> you'd at least want to *appear* to be honest, even
> if you're not. -- Handsome Jack Morrison *gently
> remove the detonator to reply via e-mail
"Handsome Jack Morrison"
wrote in
<message
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:52:18 -0400, "Krishur"
> wrote:
>
> >Good books huh?
>
> Absolutely. Some are, in fact, classics.
>
> >Which idea was your favorite, the one where they
> >tell you to alpha roll a "dominant" dog,
>
> There's nothing inherently wrong with rolling a dog
> (i.e., it *can* and *does* work in *some*
> situations). Unfortunately, most people either do it
> incorrectly, do it at the wrong time, etc.
>
> >or where they tell you that you didn't hit him hard
> >enough if he doesn't yelp or approaches you within
> >5 minutes of his punishment?
>
> If physical discipline is deemed necessary (after
> careful evaluation), it's much more cruel not to get
> it over with quickly than it is to do it
> incrementally and half-heartedly, which usually only
> invites the need for even more discipline.
>
> >Maybe you liked when they recommend these beatings
> >for housebreaking accidents, chewing/destructive
> >behavior, stealing, trying to get on your bed
> >at night and dog on dog aggression.
>
> At no time do the Monks *ever* advocate beating a
> dog. A swat on the rump or a check to the chin does
> *not* constitute a "beating."
>
> I'm sorry if you don't agree.
>
> And each of those behavior "problems" needs to be
> looked at in its proper context.
>
> A quote from the Monks:
>
> "We repeat, these situations may merit physical
> discipline. Since no book can pretend to analyze
> every individual dog and situation, we feel
> obligated to emphasize from the outset that
> discipline is never an arbitrary training
> technique to be applied to each and every dog for
> all offenses. We do, however, believe that physical
> and verbal discipline can be an effective technique.
> The best policy if you experience any of the above
> problems is to consult a qualified trainer or
> veterinarian for evaluation of your individual
> situation....
>
> "If discipline is decided upon as a training
> technique, it should be the proper technique. We
> feel we have developed several methods that depend
> less on violent physical force than timing, a flair
> for drama, and the element of surprise.
> We feel an obligation, as responsible trainers, to
> map out
> these methods, rather than simply skip the topic
> because it is unpleasant. Dog owners want to know
> what to do."
>
> In other words, physical discipline is reserved for
> those serious, special occasions when other methods
> have failed.
>
> For example, they do not recommend using physical
> discipline for *routine* housebreaking chores --
> only on those rare occasions when an already
> reliably housebroken dog is (after careful
> evaluation) deemed to be soiling the house on
> purpose, backsliding, etc.
>
> I'll give you an actual example. Years ago, an
> adult dog was brought to me as an *incurable*
> house-soiler. It was either get the dog reliably
> housetrained or the dog was going on a one way trip
> to the pound. Being the kind, compassionate trainer
> that I am, I was prepared to do whatever it took to
> get this dog house-trained and save his life.
>
> After several weeks of more or less traditional
> training, and to poor result, I brought out the big
> guns -- physical and verbal discipline. Whenever the
> dog soiled the house (no, you don't even have to
> catch him in the act), I immediately (but very
> calmly) tossed a leash on his collar, dragged him to
> the scene of the crime, and (using a large
> chair as a prop) tethered him to the leg of the
> chair, with his nose about two inches away from the
> poop. After a couple of swats on the rump, some
> loud vocalizing, and a wait of about 20 minutes, I'd
> release the dog and then ignore him for a while. I
> had to repeat this process *three* times, I think --
> and the house-soiling miraculously stopped. The dog
> went home to enjoy a long and contented life with
> his original owners, and I got to feel good about
> myself.
>
> So, yes, the Monk's books are good ones. Even for
> novices.
>
> Yup, that's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.
>
> -- Handsome Jack Morrison *gently remove the
> detonator to reply via e-mail
ADIOS, chump.
The Amazing Puppy Wizard <{) ; ~ ) >
>> Stay informed about: Lab Protective Behavior?